Follow Draft Sharks on: follow us on twitter twitter | follow us using rss rss feed | use our email updates email updates

Archive for October, 2009

ESPN, Jay Cutler, and The Game Clock

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

by Brett Barclay

 

I’ve got a pretty solid Friday routine. Get home from the bar around 2:15. Put on my Syracuse Basketball shorts. Pour myself a bowl of Cherrios. Plop myself on the couch. And painfully turn on The World Wide Leader, because in my buzzed state I truly believe that “it will be good for my job.” 
But as I fell asleep to that warming glow last weekend, I heard Trey Wingo say something to the effect of “Jay Cutler sucks!” That got me thinking — most of my fantasy cohorts actually believe this crap. And why wouldn’t they? ESPN is accessible, loves Boston and New York, and won’t ever, EVER, stray from conventional thinking – essentially any female in a Woody Allen movie. So, after a week of TiVoing NFL Live, my brain was a soggy ball of clichés. Coaches “just wanting to get better.” Teams going “back and forth all day.” And Brett Favre being “just a kid out there.”
But after my quasi-experiment, one thing stood out. There is a big difference between ESPN-good and fantasy football-good. And there is an even bigger difference between ESPN-suck and fantasy football-suck.
I present you exhibit 1a and 1b – 2008 Joe Flacco and 2009 Mark Sanchez. As a rookie last year, Flacco started all 16 games for the Ravens, won 11 of them, and even took his team to an AFC Championship. If you lived in a lead boat for the 2008 season and all you had was a TV that showed NFL Live on repeat, Joe Flacco was a golden god by way of ESPN-talk.
In the fantasy realm, Flacco finished 20th among QBs, barely worth a roster spot. Never threw for 300 yards, cracked 250 once and had 5 multi-INT games.
We saw the Flacco effect with Mark Sanchez this year – well, before the Buffalo game. The only difference is that it was magnified ten fold because he’s in New York and he’s so darn cute. Those kind of things work for ESPN.
And we all saw what happened to Flacco in the Buffalo game. Need I say more about his fantasy value?
I needed to find more players that fit into this theory, so I started to compile a list of players that met the following criteria:
·         Generally considered a “bad” player by mainstream media.
·         Had a bit of ESPN-hype surrounding him this offseason that led to semi-unreasonable expectations.
·         Is still performing in the top-20 at his position (fantasy-wise) despite being “bad”
·         Most importantly, has a favorable outlook for the rest of the season
To my surprise, the list was short. Torry Holt was close, but sat just outside of most criteria. Clinton Portis was another, but again, he was teetering on the edge of most criteria. But the one player that stuck out like a sore thumb was Jay Cutler.
First of all, Cutler has a bad attitude. You can’t deny that. The guy acts like all of the chairs in his house are made of razorblades. And on top of that, he’s kinda ugly. If ESPN rated players like my buddies rate girls he’d be a 4:22 [1]. These are key elements to unnecessary criticism that a lot of players get from The Worldwide Leader. With that said, Cutler’s not getting off free here either – not in this blog. Some of that criticism is warranted. His 1st game as a Bear was atrocious — 1 TD, 4 INTs. And his most recent game as a Bear wasn’t any better — 1 TD, 3 INTs. But in ESPN’s bizarre world, those are the games that get magnified. The top-10 (fantasy) performances in the 4 games in between are what the ESPN crowd is not seeing.
So here it is. I am issuing a “Trade Now for Jay Cutler” advisory. The advisory is in effect until Sunday, any later and you’ll be out of luck. I say this because Cutler is on the verge of blowing up and it starts Sunday against the Browns.
Check it out:
First — and this is more of a rule of thumb for trading this time of year — Cutler has already had his bye week.  So in that regard you’re getting an extra ounce of value out of any trade because it’s guaranteed fantasy points that otherwise you would not have.
For the number-crunchers, take a look at his split stats over the course of his career. Historically, November is Cutler’s best month of football with 13 TDs in 9 games, just 8 INTs, and an average of just under 250 yards per game.
But most importantly, it’s the schedule. The Bears have 10 games remaining. These are 8 of those opponents with their pass defense rank in parenthesis: Cleveland (24th), Arizona (29th), San Francisco (21st), Minnesota (20th), St. Louis (25th), Baltimore (23rd), Minnesota again, and Detroit (30th).   And those other 2 opponents, Green Bay and Philadelphia, are both in the bottom-half of the league in passing TDs allowed.
And finally, despite what ESPN tells you, this offense isn’t that bad. There are plenty of passing options. These weak defenses in the upcoming weeks will spark the running game.  And every week, Cutler becomes more familiar with a Bears offense that is still relatively new to him.
Find your Cutler owner, pray that he’s an ESPN junkie, and make this trade. He’s the 16th ranked QB in most formats right now. I’m betting he finished the season inside the top-10.




[1] We have this system that we call “The Game Clock.”  Someone asks, “what time’s the game?” Other friend spots the female and responds using an hour and minute. The hour is the chick’s overall rating and the minute is the estimated age.

The Frisman Jackson Theory

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

by Brett Barclay

The Frisman Jackson Theory states that during the first 2 weeks of every NFL season, there will be at least 2 relative unknowns that come sprinting out of the gate with monster games. One of those unknowns will fall back into fantasy obscurity – the Frisman – and the other will be glorified as a fantasy savior – the Anquan.
A year-by-year breakdown of the Anquans and the Frismans:
2005                         Breakout Week                   Season Total
Anquan Boldin:         Week 2: 8-119                       (102-1,402-7)
Had owners waited until Week 2 to add that key free agent WR, the lucky ones would have struck gold with Anquan Boldin. Savvy fantasy owners were onto him the season before after he went over 100 yards in 2 of the Cardinals final 4 games in 2004. But in most leagues, he was the free agent addition of the year.
Frisman Jackson:       Week 1: 8-128-1                   (24-287-1)
The man behind the science. Jackson had the benefit of playing against the Bengals that week, a unit that ended up being the league’s 7th worst pass defense that year. A QB carousel between ESPN’s Trent Dilfer and Charlie Frye, along with a series of midseason inactives, cut the golden boy’s season short.
2006
Marques Colston:      Week 1: 4-49-1                      (70-1,038-8)
In one of the biggest paperwork blunders in NFL history, Colston snuck through the cracks his rookie season as a TE and was credited as such throughout the fantasy season while lining up at WR. He was so successful because that offense, like it is now, was just an all out attack with a healthy Drew Brees at the helm. Colston added another 54 yards and a TD in Week 2.
Troy Williamson:      Week 2: 6-102                       (37-455-0)
There was always so much potential for this kid. The former 7th overall selection started the year off with a bang, collecting 77 yards in Week 1and following it up with a 102-yard performance in Week 2. But Williamson was the casualty of a pre-Adrian Peterson offense in Minnesota that lacked an identity — an easy place for a young WR to get lost.
2007
Wes Welker:              Week 2: 8-91                                     (112-1,175-8)
Like Boldin, only the savvy were onto Welker, but there were a lot of question marks going into this season. For one, Welker was heading from Miami to New England, but also new in town were Randy Moss and Donte Stallworth and they were going to demand a ton of balls. On top of that, the last time a Patriots WR went over 1,000 yards was in 2001. But as we all know, for 16 games that Patriots offense was symphonic and unlike anything the NFL had ever seen.
Antwaan Randle El:  Week 1: 5-162                       (61-728-1)
In doing this research, Randle El’s name came up a few times for hot starts and dud seasons. He’s always had the explosiveness but never the consistency. Randle El would only eclipse 70 yards 1 more time that season. His downfall? The Joe Gibbs era.
2008
Eddie Royal:               Week 1: 9-146-1                   (91-980-5)
Brandon Stokley appeared to have the slot position locked up and Darrell Jackson was brought in to take care of the #2 WR duties.  But Royal quickly surpassed Stokley and made fantasy owners very happy in the slot, catching 91 balls his rookie season. He benefitted heavily from Brandon Marshall taking most of the coverage out deep.
Greg Lewis:                Week 1: 5-104                       (19-247-1)
There seems to be a Greg Lewis just about every year, and a few times that guy has been Greg Lewis. But his Week 1 campaign had fantasy owners running to the waiver wire. Eventually, Lewis drowned in Andy Reid’s spread offense and was rarely heard from again.
And our 2009 candidates…
2009
Mike Sims-Walker:    Week 2 6-106-1                    (28-398-3) (4 games)
He really fell into a good situation. It’s a run-first team, so he won’t be asked to do too much. And he’s got one of the most underrated accurate passers in football and a legend in Torry Holt operating on the other side of the field to ease the coverage.
Devery Henderson: Week 1 5-103-1                    (15-241-1) (5 games)
Henderson’s situation was a lot like Greg Lewis’ last year. The talent is there, the speed is definitely there, but it’s a numbers game, and there are only so many balls to go around on a given day.
We could have went a number of ways with this year’s Frisman and Anquan, but these 2 seem to be the best fit to hold true to the theory. As fantasy enthusiasts, making the right call in these situations is crucial to success. You want a guy that isn’t going to get lost in a shuffle of WR; you want a guy with a solid QB; and you want a guy that isn’t on an anemic offense.

FF Gamesmanship

Monday, October 19th, 2009

by Brett Barclay

I think gamesmanship is just a footnote in the battle studies of fantasy football, and I can’t understand why. It matters. I promise you that it will get you at the very least 1 win aper season on its own.
You’ve gone through this scenario in your head a few times. It’s Monday night. You’ve got a 2-point lead. Your opponent is done for the week. You, on the other hand, have Shayne Graham and a scoring system that docks points for missed FGs. It’s a windy night in Pittsburgh and you’re really not feeling Graham on the road. Are the total points worth it? Should I bench Shayne Graham and take the W? You leave him in. He scores 5 points. Bullet dodged.
But here’s a bit of a rule stretch that is highly underrated: using your bench to make your opponent’s bye weeks or injuries a nightmare.
I’ve played in a Yahoo! League with my high school buddies going on 11 years now. Being traditionalists, we’ve changed nothing since the early days. We still start 2 QBs. The scoring system still ridiculously over values them. We still have our championship during Week 17. Someone annually gets Tashard Choice’d. And the bench has always been really, really, ridiculously deep.
This is where the fantasy nerd kicks in. Seven days before I play my next opponent (while I’m still playing my current one) I check over his lineup, look for glaring holes and bye weeks and head over to the waiver wire. Then, in my best opinion, I take the best possible fits for his team and add them – like a thief in the night. It doesn’t seem like much, and for the most part usually amounts to nothing, but once a season I strike gold and my opponent is starting the likes of BenJarvus Ellis-Green. This works especially well with defenses and guys who only have 1 defense that is currently on a bye.
It’s a lot like playing your best friend in Madden and running the clock to end the game. Any self respecting Madden fan knows that you don’t punt (ever) and you do not run the clock. It’s video game code when you’re playing your buddies. If you do, you’re an insufferable ass. 
But I don’t feel like the same rules should apply when money is at stake. Personally, I’ll take being an insufferable ass. Last summer I wore an Ed Hardy brand shirt, I really liked that Soulja Boy song, and I put gel in my hair. So I’m a preconditioned insufferable. And if there is money on the line? Child please – I am going to scratch and claw my way to a win.
I love my friends. I really do. But I’ll love them more when I have their money in January.
What do you think? Does gamesmanship within the rules take away from the integrity that our fantasy forefathers created? Or are these tactics just a groin punch?